Astonishingly, thousands of blacks in the United States have converted to Louis Farrakhan’s “Nation of Islam.” Farrakhan and his predecessors have targeted black American men for their own racial war against whites, Jews, and non-black minority groups. Farrakhan has used deceit and blatant lies to ensnare the African community to fight his war. Those who wish to follow Farrakhan’s own particular form of Islam should reconsider their misguided allegiance.

The following textual evidence demonstrates the indisputable historical fact that the original religion of Islam was vehemently racist toward those of black African lineage. The teachings of many of the U.S. black militant Islamic groups are considered apostate to the Islamic faith and doctrinal code of Muhammad. Many have mixed aberrant beliefs into their own version of Islam; they include teachings of reincarnation, the incarnation of Allah into an Islamic black leader, and numerous other unorthodox tenets. Yet, these are not considered true Islamic beliefs by the majority of Muslims.

Muhammad was a White Man

There has been a myth circulated in the U.S. and other parts of the world that Muhammad was black. This assumption has no historical credibility. The Hadith gives ample evidence to the fact that Muhammad was a white man. One hadith clearly describes Muhammad’s physical appearance:

We were sitting with the prophet in the Mosque, when a man came riding on a camel. He let his camel kneel down in the Mosque, tied its foreleg and then said:  Who amongst you is Muhammad? At that time the prophet was sitting amongst us leaning on his arm. We replied:  This reclining white man on his arm.[1]

Further hadithic evidence states: 

 (1) “And a white man (person) (i.e. the Prophet) who is requested to pray for rain . . . “[2] (2) “He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of his thigh.”[3] (3) “When the Prophet prayed, he used to separate his arms from his body so widely that the whiteness of his armpits was seen.”[4] (4) “The Prophet was carrying earth with us on the day of the battle of al-Ahzab (confederates) and I saw the dust was covering the whiteness of his abdomen.”[5] From the overwhelming evidence, there can be no doubt that Muhammad was a white man.

Muhammad Owned Black Slaves

The Hadith historically recorded Muhammad’s personal ownership of black slaves, “So I went to the upper room where the Prophet was and said to a black slave of his, will you get the permission of the Prophet for Umar (to enter)?”[6] The biographies of the prophet had named several of his black slaves as Bilal, Abu Hurairah, Usamah ebn Zaayed, and Rabbah. One particular male African slave, named Mahran, was re-named Safina (ship), by Muhammad. From the anonymous author’s book, Behind the Veil:  Unmasking Islam, Mahran (Safina) recounted his ordeal:

“The apostle of God and his companions went on a trip. (When) their belongings became too heavy for them to carry, Muhammad told me, ‘spread your garment.’ They filled it with their belongings, then they put it on me. The apostle of God told me, ‘carry (it), for you are a ship.’ Even if I was carrying the load of six or seven donkeys while we were on a journey, anyone who felt weak would throw his clothes or his shield or his sword on me so I would carry that, a heavy load. The prophet told me, ‘you are a ship’” (refer to Ibn Qayyim, pp. 115-116; al-Hulya, vol. 1, p. 369, quoted from Ahmad 5:222).[7]

Muhammad’s Derogatory Statements against Black People

Repeatedly, Muhammad described Ethiopians as raisin heads and infidels.[8] He once dreamed of a black woman and assumed this was representative of an evil omen or coming epidemic.[9] Other traditions quoted him saying blacks were pug-nosed slaves. Since it is clear that Muhammad had an aversion toward Africans (blacks), his animosity of racial bigotry denoted the true nature of his disdain toward other ethnic people.


Muhammad owned numerous slaves, both male and female. Muslims have followed his example and have aggressively bartered in the slave trade for almost 1400 years. This Islamic slave trade continues to this day. Historical evidence documents that the Arab slave trade was the major seller of blacks. One estimate claimed, during the period between 650 and 1900, Arab slave traders stole 14.4 million blacks from Africa.[10] Without respect to human rights, millions of black slaves have been sold around the world in direct correlation to Islamic oppression and unscrupulous dogma which contradicts the New Testament teachings.

When the Muslims first invaded Northern Africa, they gave the blacks a choice to follow Islam or become slaves to be sold. Trade between the Muslims and Europeans stemmed from the Islamic practice of slave trading. Many of the larger tribes throughout Africa aligned themselves with the Muslims to capture enemy tribes. Thus, Africans enslaved one another in collusion with the Muslim slave traders. Prior to the Islamic or European slave trade, Africa had a harsh slavery tradition among their own people for territorial conquest and power. Blacks were involved in slavery long before other nations conquered them; but Muslims amplified the practice to satiate a world market looking to fill its greedy appetite for cheap labor.

In Islamic dominated countries today, a large scale slave trade continues unabated, trading blacks, whites, oriental, other ethnic groups, and even children. Many of these children are used as sexual toys for the wealthier clientele. In the Sudan, Arab slave traders still buy and sell Dinka slaves to family and friends. Many of these slaves are transported to the wealthy nations of the Middle East to service the powerful oil sheiks.
















Currently, the number of chattel slaves has been estimated in the tens of thousands. Some of the newly captured slaves attempt to escape and are often murdered as a consequence. Frequently, women and young girls are savagely raped and sodomized. The Qur’an sanctioned sex with any girl [at any age] that one owns, “And all married women are forbidden unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand possess” (Qur’an 4:24). Under Islam, a slave has no legal rights. He or she is cruelly treated and simply considered material possessions. Ibn Warraq has cited an astonishing report:

In the French magazine, L Vie (no. 2562, 6 Oct. 1994) 45,000 young black Africans per year are still kidnapped and reduced to slavery—as servants in the gulf states and the Middle East.[11]

Many of these slaves were acquired from Southern Sudan. The Islamic government of Sudan financially and often militarily assisted in the raping and subjugation of the black Christians of southern Sudan.













During the summer of 1992, I witnessed evidence of these atrocities on my third missionary trip to Africa. I was standing on a sidewalk in downtown Nairobi, Kenya and was approached by a well spoken middle-aged man. He asked for a cigarette but I said I was a missionary en route to Burundi and did not smoke. He began to relay to me his recent personal saga. To my surprise, he claimed to have walked all the way from Sudan to Nairobi and was planning to continue his quest and join a militia training camp inTanzania. His plans were to equip himself with the necessary training and weapons in order to eventually return and fight with the resistance movement in his home land of southern Sudan.

His family and friends were massacred by the Muslim forces from the North of Sudan. He pulled up his pants to reveal his ankles which were swollen larger than softballs due to the extreme distance he had already walked, perhaps anywhere from 600 to 900 miles. I was dumbfounded since the news media had covered little on these events. I gave him a few dollars and wished him good luck on his journey.


It was not until over a decade later, during the Darfur genocide, that the media and notable personalities began to point out the outrageous deeds by the Islamic perpetrators and their cohorts. Most established agencies have estimated 300,000 to 450,000 dead and up to 2 million displaced. In addition, vast numbers of these Sudanese victims were captured as slaves and often raped.

These are only a few examples of the subjugation of blacks by the Arab slave trade. Islam does not promote morality in relation to human rights. The Islamic practice of sexual abuse, slavery and racism has been well documented; it remains a religion of bigotry, intolerance, and war. Undoubtedly, the reason one-fifth the population of the world follows the Islamic system is due to a lack of historical knowledge and awareness of the issues disclosed in this documentation.





The founding apostles of Christianity lived during the reign of the powerful Roman Empire where slavery was the norm. The early Christian writers were not officials and could not abolish the existing Roman laws concerning slavery, but they did denounce such practices as evil. The apostle Paul admonished Christians to abandon any participation in this abhorrent market. In verse sixteen of his letter to the Christian, Philemon, he asked that the runaway slave, Onesimus, be returned and to be regarded, “No longer as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved.” In the context, the term ‘servant’ meant “slave” in Koine Greek. Slave trading was considered a serious sin in the New Testament. The Bible ranked this transgression among others:

For the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of mothers, for menstealers, for whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine (I Tim. 1:9-10).

The original Greek renders ‘menstealer’ (antrapodistais) as: “Manstealer, a slave-dealer, kidnapper, one who unjustly takes free men into slavery, or one who steals the slaves of others and sells them.” Anyone who has partaken in the slave trade business or owned slaves has broken the New Testament’s teachings.

Even among Christians, the abuse of slavery resulted in a bloody civil war among the states of the Union. This sin brought mass carnage upon brothers and sisters of the same faith. Disobedience to scriptural teachings ultimately brings judgment from Yahveh. Muhammad, however, also opposed the original biblical scriptures in favor of his way of life. Frequently, he claimed Moses as a great hero who led his people out of Egyptian bondage; yet, hypocritically, he personally demonstrated his engagement in the slave trade as both owner and instigator.

Obviously, Muhammad was not a prophet of the biblical tenets and doctrinal persuasion prescribed in the New Testament. Consequently, Muhammad and his followers will face a final judgment for disobeying the Judaic scriptures and for following after the false moon-god, Allah.

From Chapter 15 of Mecca, Muhammad & the Origins of Islam:  A Candid Investigation Into the Origins of Islam.

[1] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 1, no. 63:35-6.

[2] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 2, no. 1008:47.

[3] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 1, no. 371:138.

[4] Ibid., 390:144.

[5] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 9, no. 7236:273; vol. 4, no. 2837:45.

[6] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 7, no. 5191:99; vol. 3, no. 2468:257.

[7] n.a., Behind the Veil, 154.

[8] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 1, no. 693:232; vol. 3, no. 2488:267.

[9] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 9, no. 7038:141.

[10] Adams, Religion that is Raping America, 57.

[11] Warraq, Why I Am Not a Muslim, 205.

Creative Commons License
Muhammad (A Racist Slave Trader?) by Brett Stortroen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Was Muhammad a Pedophile?

The greatest evidence of Muhammad’s lust may be demonstrated in his marriage to a six-year-old girl named Aisha. Muhammad was about 53 years old when he betrothed his child bride. Later, at the age of nine, Aisha was handed over to the prophet to consummate the marriage. The Hadith records this account:

Aisha narrated: . . . my mother, um Ruman came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted me to do. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. . . . Unexpectedly, Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.[7]

Before the age of puberty, the young child was brought to the prophet Muhammad to have sexual consummation. A vivid portrayal of her young age had been recorded in one of the hadiths:

I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the prophet would call them to join and play with me. The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for Aisha, at that time she was a little girl, she did not yet reach the age of puberty.[8]

Imagine, the 53 year old prophet Muhammad having sexual intercourse with this innocent child who played with her dolls. Muhammad joins the ranks of many other religious cult leaders who have engaged in unbiblical sexual practices. Amazingly, throughout the world, Muhammad has been revered and idolized by Muslim men for centuries. In several countries, older Muslim men often legally marry young girls before they reach puberty. Islamic law permits young girls to be given away in marriage.[9] Based upon their own lustful role model these men choose to harm innocent children and mentally scar them for life.

With the exploding population of Muslims in England, the divorce laws have been altered for those who follow the Islamic faith. The question remains, what other laws may be subsequently changed to cater to Islam’s perverted forms of justice and sexual deviations? Will pedophilia be allowed for Muslims? Will they establish Sharia law zones in provinces that have significant Muslim populations? Will political correctness bend to the whims of the Islamic factions and surrender their own common law heritage?


Islamists excuse Muhammad’s marriage to the child bride based upon his wish to unite the Arabic Bedouin tribes. This type of circular reasoning creates an even greater dilemma. Since many of the leaders of the Arabic tribes had older daughters and sisters, why could Muhammad not marry one of them? The answer appears to be quite evident; Muhammad’s unbridled sexual appetite compelled him to partake in the most perverted indulgence, pedophilia. Virtually, any modern court of law would pronounce Muhammad guilty as a pedophile.

Muhammad’s derogatory view of women has been irrefutably demonstrated. Whereas, the biblical revelation of the Holy Bible has given women equality to that of a man, but the Qur’an relegates women to the status of an animal (cattle) or soil to be tilled. Muhammad exemplified antisocial behavior devoid of conscience regarding the rights of women and young girls. His pronouncements and condoning of women-beating demonstrates that he should be classified as a sadistic psychopath; not only to women but also to those who oppose his false teachings. Muhammad was a vicious, cruel man, who instituted a religion of violence by the sword with little regard for human rights, especially to women.

From Chapter 11 of Mecca, Muhammad & the Origins of Islam:  A Candid Investigation Into the Origins of Islam.

[7] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 5, no. 3894:88-9.

[8] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 8, no. 6130:49.

[9] n.a., Behind the Veil, 81-3.


Related links:

Creative Commons License
Was Muhammad a Pedophile? by Brett Stortroen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Most Women Sent to Hell & Celestial Nymphs in Paradise

Muhammad’s low opinion of women even includes their final judgment and destiny. The Hadith states:

The prophet said:  I saw Paradise and stretched my hands towards a bunch (of its fruit) and had I taken it, you would have eaten from it as long as the world remains. I also saw the hell-fire and I have never seen such a horrible sight. I saw that most of the inhabitants were women. The people asked:  O Allah’s Apostle! Why is it so? The prophet said:  They are ungrateful to their companions of life (husbands) and ungrateful to good deeds. If you are benevolent to one of them throughout the life and if she sees anything (undesirable) in you, she will say:  I have never had any good from you.[9]

Apparently, Muhammad’s personal life colored his view of women so negatively that he prophesied their destined future to an eternal hell. Another account from the Hadith elaborates further:

Once Allah’s Apostle went out to the place of prayer he passed by the Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said:  O women! Give charity, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women). They asked:  Why is it so, O Allah’s Apostle? He said:  You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you. The women asked:  O Allah’s Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion? He said:  This is the deficiency in your intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses? The woman replied in the affirmative:  This is the deficiency in your religion.[10]

Muhammad believed a natural biological function of a woman’s body affected her intelligence and her faith. His own bitter feelings towards his wives and women, in general, had relegated Muslim women to the level of animals and even dirt (soil to be tilled). Muhammad, by his own words, prophesied damnation in hell for the greater part of most women, and not excluding mothers.

Would any sensible woman follow a prophet who viewed females in such a way? What would the benefits be in such a religion if you were destined for hell anyway? Any woman submitting herself to such derogation is doomed for mental and physical humiliation. Once entrapped within this Islamic communal system the woman displays symptoms of what psychologists refer to as the Stockholm syndrome; a term describing how hostages begin to express empathy and attachment towards their captors, even to the point of defending them. Many of those ensnared in manipulative and abusive cults exhibit similar irrational feelings of bonding with their so-called prophets and gurus.


As Muhammad engaged in holy war or looting raids, he would meticulously promise an appealing sensual Paradise to those who died in battle or for those who stood firm in their allegiance to the prophet. This Paradise includes the Persian legends of the hurs (houris), “mentioned four times in (Qur’an 52:20, 56:22, 55:72, 44:54), literally means having eyes with marked contrast of black and white [al-hur al-ayn].”[11] They are alluded to in other suras:

Even so (it will be). And we shall wed them unto fair ones with wide, lovely eyes. . . . Therein are those of modest gaze, whom neither man nor jinni will have touched before them, Fair ones, close guarded in pavilions. . . . Reclining on green cushions and fair carpets (Qur’an 44:54, 55:56-76).

Logically, since most women are destined for hell, Muhammad had to find a source of women for Paradise to appease his men; thus, he borrowed the Persian legends of the celestial hurs (possibly etymologically linked to the word ‘whore’ in English). In the hereafter, these nymphs were created specifically for the eternal sexual pleasure of Muslim men. The Hadith described the pavilions where the hurs were held:

Allah’s Apostle said:  In Paradise there is a pavilion made of a single hollow pearl! Sixty miles wide, in each corner of which there are wives who will not see those in the other corners; and the believers will visit and enjoy them.[12]

While some hadiths have no limits, others place the number of wives (hurs) to two.[13] The hurs are described in detail from the Hadith:

Each of whom will be so beautiful, pure and transparent that the marrow of the bones of their legs will be seen through the flesh . . . and will never fall ill, and they will neither blow their noses, nor spit . . . and their sweat will smell like musk.[14]

Other traditions have mentioned that they need no sleep nor do they become pregnant. Muslim preachers, scholars, and Jihad warriors are obsessed with thoughts of sex in the afterlife. One of Egypt’s most prestigious preachers, Abdel Hamid Kishk, expounded his theology concerning the “youths” mentioned in the Qur’an:  “Muslims who entered paradise would enjoy eternal erections and the company of young boys draped in earrings and necklaces.”[15] One of Islam’s most respected religious schools, the al-Azhar University, only slightly disagreed. They maintained that “men in paradise would have erections, but merely protracted, not perpetual. Other experts disputed the possibility of pederasty in paradise.”[16]

Muslims hold to the belief that indulging in alcohol, adultery, fornication, and homosexuality are taboo on earth; yet, once they enter Paradise, they are allowed to indulge in such carnalities. The teachings of Muhammad and his moon-god Allah completely oppose the Judaic Torah and Christian principles of holiness in the New Testament. Apparently, Muhammad’s revelations originated from another source other than the Lord Yahveh.

The biblical vision of heaven differs considerably from the version of the Muslim’s Paradise. Islamic orthodoxy claims to have accepted the Pentateuch, Psalms, and the Gospels as valid revelations. Conveniently, whenever the Qur’an differs, it takes precedence over the Holy Bible. To the contrary, Jesus (Yahsu), announces to the religious leaders of his day, “For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven” (Mt. 22:30). This most likely implies that the glorified bodies of those resurrected have no sexual passion; so, there appears to be no reason for sexual nymphs or youths to gratify the flesh.

Once again, Muhammad contradicts the teachings of Yahsu and substitutes his own imagination against the Holy Tanach and the New Testament tenets. To the natural and carnal-minded man, Muhammad’s path seems appealing, but the veracity of his teachings remains highly suspect and irregular. According to Muhammad’s own statements, women on earth, including mothers and sisters, have virtually no chance of avoiding hell. On account of Muhammad’s bigoted concept and depiction of women as animals and soil; he has promulgated a lack of admiration and respect for women as individuals and womanhood in general.

For the Muslim woman, the choice of whether to follow Yahsu or Muhammad’s Allah, seems quite obvious to an objective individual. What rational woman would choose certain damnation for their destiny? The Muslim woman may wish to look to Jesus (Yahsu) for salvation. The Bible declares, “For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved” (Rom. 10:13). However, for a woman to convert out of Islam poses a serious challenge due to the imminent threats she will face in the form of beatings, mutilation, banishment from family, and often execution. This is also an opportunity for the Christian community to provide a means for these women to follow through on their desires to follow Christ and live without fear.

From Chapter 10 of Mecca, Muhammad & the Origins of Islam:  A Candid Investigation Into the Origins of Islam.

[9] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 2, no. 1052:64; vol. 7, no. 5197-98:51-2.

[10] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 1, no. 304:111-12; vol. 2, no. 1462:202.

[11] Jane Idleman Smith and Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad, The Islamic Understanding of Death and Resurrection (Albany:  State University of New York Press, 1981), 164.

[12] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 6, no. 4879:218; vol. 4, no. 3243:197.

[13] al-Boukhari, Hadith, vol. 4, no. 3245-46:197-98.

[14] Ibid., 3246:198.

[15] Judith Miller, God Has Ninety-Nine Names:  Reporting From A Militant Middle East (N.Y.:  Simon and Schuster Inc., 1996), 26.

[16] Ibid.

Creative Commons License
Most Women sent to Hell & Celestial Nymphs in Paradise by Brett Stortroen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.


Many Christians and Jews believe that Allah or his other pseudonym, ar-Rahman (Merciful One), and Yahveh are one and the same. Considering the vast archaelogical and historical source material to the contrary, one cannot logically make this sort of equivocation. Allah arose out of the pagan milieu of astrological rites and centered on the moon-god worship among the groves. Nowhere does historical empirical evidence mention the name Allah in reference to the Judaic God of the Jews or Christians. Continue reading

The “Mark of the Beast” and Islam

The Mark of the Beast

The number of the beast has been an enigma since the Book of Revelation was written. Many interpret the mark as a high tech device implanted into or onto the right hand or forehead. This scenario remains possible. However, could there be an alternative explanation? The following analysis is only presented as a hypothesis which requires further research.

Continue reading